quinta-feira, 16 de junho de 2022

Judge's self-confession of suspicion


Roberto da Silva Rocha, university professor and political scientist
Judge's self-confession of suspicion
Books on Amazon.com
Witnesses cannot have feelings with emotional relationships with accused or parties in the process, much less with the judges of the cases, that is to say that personal relationships cannot interfere with justice, whether love or antipathy and hate are enough to drive away witnesses from the defense and prosecution, so mandate the code of civil procedure and the code of criminal procedure.

All the cases against former President Lula were shelved because it was discovered through a clandestine espionage company that there was an attempt by the judge of the case against former President Lula, Judge Sérgio Moro, who would have interfered in favor of the prosecution by helping and advising the prosecutors to formulate the evidence against the case that he himself was going to judge, considering that the judge expressed an unfavorable inclination to his defendant in the case, therefore, he violated impartiality and did not declare himself precluded from judging the case because of some interest in the case.

We hear and read every day in the written media, in videos and in audios the explicit manifestations of antipathy and disapproval of STF ministers against President JMB, and even so all actions and demands that reach the STF are always judged against the defendant JMB without any of these judges declaring themselves prevented from expressing themselves in the records of the cases and actions, even manifesting themselves outside the records on the matters of the cases and on the formalities required for the procedures of the respective records, including anticipating their sentences through publicized locutions and previously announced even before receiving the records.

Roberto da Silva Rocha, professor universitário e cientista político

Nenhum comentário: