Even drug dealers work

Even drug dealers work

If you consider any physical and intellectual human effort as work, then we can hypothetically assume that drug dealers also work to obtain financial resources. Rapists need to make physical efforts to surprise their victims and use a lot of energy and cunning to deceive and trick them, and to subdue their victims physically or through psychological violation.

There was a genius of humanity who discovered that human beings could eat without having to plant, or buy, without needing money to acquire food, and could even live in a residence and transform it into a home without any effort, without any savings and without having to get into debt. He apparently called it socialism.

How is it possible to imagine that hypothetically there were a couple of survivors on an isolated island and one of them was a communist or socialist?

One of them, being a socialist, would think that the food for their survival could be supplied by the state.

What is the State if not an abstract legal elucidation where some meanings are significant for its conception, such as impersonality, and the indirectness of its goals and abstract meanings that result in concrete acts?

So, one of the two survivors on this island does not make an effort to obtain food every day and seek shelter for his survival, the other, who does not believe in socialism, capitalism or communism, goes out every day in search of his subsistence by gathering food and looking for safe places to shelter from the elements.

The communist expects the State to protect him from all evils and provide for his survival and well-being.

The State is the two survivors, the territory, and nature, and the tacitly agreed laws.

So, if the communist does not steal food or is not helped by the non-communist worker, he will certainly become homeless and malnourished, because the State is only the two of them.

Expanding this set of hypotheses, if the survivors were ten people and the communists were seven people, then the survival of the ten would depend on the food collection efforts of the three non-communists.

Imagine a country like Brazil with 215 million inhabitants where the communist system was implemented. Who would be the producing state to support the 70 million poor people of the exploited class of the so-called unequal? ​​Who is producing the food and the real estate systems to provide housing for the poor who do not have the means to survive and have housing?

It is clear that the main fallacy of socialism and communism is to subtract the truth that the State is simply the result of the efforts of real people who support those who are not producing. It is just a discourse to punish those who produce with the name of greedy and exploiters, but without them, the rest who do not produce or organize production would be without food and housing.

There is no state, the state is a legal abstraction that hides the social groups that produce and support those who produce nothing, therefore, someone would have to be always producing, there is no magic to appear and produce food and goods without work, and the state is those who produce, plus those who consume, within rules of reciprocal rewards; there is no way to consume without producing, the opposite of this is called communist slavery.

Roberto da Silva Rocha, professor universitário e cientista político