Intellectual and Moral Fraud
The Greatest Intellectual Fraud of the 20th Century
What would be the greatest intellectual fraud of the 20th century?
How can an entire history of civilization be
defrauded of a concept without factual proof in the test of History,
Sociology, Anthropology and Geography, without fear of trampling on statistical
methods and all investigative methodology?
Could it be thought that this was a religious fraud?
How could one build a reinterpretation of the History of humanity with
such a universal, absolute, generic, deterministic concept as for example
insinuating and imagining that a same cruel phenomenon would happen all over
the world, in every geographic and spatiotemporal place, as if it were , for
example, a phenomenon of a single universal language spoken throughout the
history of mankind, in all points of the earth's geography, in all cultures of
the world and at the same time became for thousands of years a naturally
permanent phenomenon?
It would be possible that this fact occurred in humanity during more
than fifty thousand years of civilization and pre- civilization and
that only in the century. XX was perceived such a phenomenon?
According to the theory of violation and psychic containment of the
collective unconscious, there is no possible way out of the prison of
collective consciousness.
This phenomenon of the socially determined prison of
conscience is observed when, for example, inside a prison of historical
conscience it is not given to a human being to see another possibility of
escaping from the feudal system, since it never existed nor will there be
another alternative to the feudal system. for the servant, be it for the lord,
be it for the vassal or the nobleman, be it for the clergy, once born within
this system that lasted 987 years, no chance would human beings have to change
or flee from their eternal destiny while living within. of this social network.
During the Middle Ages everything that human beings should know was
informed to them by an intercessor of the clergy.
Obey without questioning, listening without meditating, living without a
purpose other than serving God and his Lord, submitting to clerical and noble
feudal orders.
It was to fulfill all obligations, to marry whoever was determined to
them, to live without reason and to die for the deterministic social order.
How many who would challenge that social order from within it would not
survive even for the historical record, internal struggles were waged to fill
vacancies in lifetime positions that were created by the death or death of its
post-donor occupants, or by fraud, or by murder between nobles and clerics,
this was how the feudal order was reproduced.
In the feudal order only a small group of bureaucratic intellectuals and
priests were endowed with the privilege of examining the scrolls and thus
passed the secrets of writing and reading to their heirs, one only chosen to be
the apprentice of the secrets of the scrolls, certainly one in twenty thousand,
fifty thousand, or one hundred thousand individuals could read and write.
Scrolls were handwritten and copied by anyone who could pay sky-high
sums for authentic copies, so ancient and medieval literature survived until
the early Renaissance when Gutemberg created the first mechanized publishing
press in Europe, popularizing books for the West.
The medieval world was a world closed in feuds, with no circulation of
currency, no circulation of goods, no circulation of products, no circulation
of people, no circulation of ideas, no circulation of news, so nothing changed
in that world.
How could anyone produce behavior other than what their limited world
expected?
How could a Muslim boy think differently from the unique expectations
presented to him from his small and contingent world?
Outside his belief system this little Muslim has no options for
other social references, he has no family, he has no other beliefs, he has
no friends, he has no roots and would be a stranger outside his Muslim world.
It was a world without nights, where at the end of daylight nothing more
happened until the sun came back to light.
It was a world where news did not circulate on radio networks,
newspapers, television, internet, fax, only letters for those who could read,
where news was announced live in squares, as there were no sound amplifiers or
loudspeakers , neither phone nor smartphones, nor social networks such
as facebock or whatsapp , as communication was difficult in
those times of transport to rowing and sailing ships, and horse carriages.
Thus, without contextualizing and without qualifying the ancient times and
the difficulties in the circulation of ideas and information, a world where
public school was only invented by the Greeks only five hundred years before
Christ for only 5% to 10% of the citizens who were a category that excluded
women, slaves, foreigners and the dispossessed.
So in that blind, deaf and mute world, where the privileged were the
noble, clerical and illiterate landlord elites like the rest, to speak of
gender discrimination alone is an intellectual extravagance, where slavery and
servitude only disappeared from humanity when the human productive force was
surpassed by the steam and electric machines of the Industrial Revolution of
the second half of the 19th century in England, then Germany and finally the
rest of Europe, but even so the Industrial Revolution created the servitude of
the industrial proletariat that only had the labor rights recognized with
Socialism and corporatist revolutionary Marxism .
Karl Marx devoted his entire life to examining the inequality and social
injustice of workers and peasants in RI, but neither he (no other scholars,
male or female) discovered or questioned any gender inequality in society: the
proletarians, the proletarians, male and female workers in industrial centers
who transformed degraded labor into industrial inputs that from the army of
idle labor extracted the added value of degraded labor, including and mainly
exploiting child and youth labor, mercilessly, in the worst conditions that he
ever dreamed of a feudal lord or that he imagined a slave master.
You worked without interruption until exhaustion, or until someone got
sick, died, or gave up.
Such was the human side of the Industrial Revolution in Liverpool or any
European industrial city.
the fraud
From where the gender privileges that feminazists accuse the
masculine side of humanity of having denied them space in the so-called sexist
world were seen, if not because of the very inappetence of gender women in
fighting for a miserable space in the slums of Liverpool factories, or
Manchester, were it not for the more restricted ability to work 20 hours
straight, what was the only requirement for vying for a place in the city or
country worker's struggle, if it could sell another product more valuable than
its manpower?
Your beauty, for example, as you always did.
Were it not for the testimony of Taj Mahal, and other vehement
testimonies and unforgettable cases in history, almost this piece of fiction
about the unimportance of women who gained an unusual and
inexplicable reverberation, unusual about what is falsely seen as the
devaluation of the feminine in the History of humanity that almost destroyed
the relationship between people, regardless of gender , brought about by
the so-called political correctness.
Taj Mahal witnesses the passion of an Indian nobleman for a woman, the
love so great that he immortalized his beloved in the mausoleum regarded as one
of the eight wonders of world architecture.
Built between 1630 and 1652 in Agra, India just to show the immense love
of Maharaja Shahdjaham to a single woman in his life who loved more
than himself.
His favorite honored wife was
named Aryumand Banu Begam , whom he affectionately
called Mumtaz Mahal.
Another obvious case of unfathomable love sparked the Trojan War, but it
is more part of Greek mythology than history. It occurred between 1200 BC
and 1300 BC. Princess Helen had been kidnapped by Troy's
enemies , the Achaeans.
It happened that while visiting Sparta, Paris , son of
King Priam of Troy , falling in love with Helen, decided to
kidnap her, so more than a thousand ships were sent to rescue her.
Other historical love affairs were the odysseys
of Nefertiti and Cleopatra.
Cleopatra seduced a Roman emperor, and at the same time the Egyptian
Pharaoh, year 50 BC. Mark Antony the Roman and Ptolemy XIII the Egyptian
Pharaoh.
Before entering into considerations about intergender relationships, it
is good to remember that he only had access to a good wife who could pay with
dowries that varied according to the beauty of the lady to be won.
This habit, still very common in Africa, can leave many men single
because they do not have material goods to marry their loved ones, goods that
can range from a few cattle to thousands of head of cattle, and thousands of
hectares of land.
Where was that Nazi speech that women have always been a sexual object
despised and despised without importance in the male world, if men were never
exchanged or wanted as consorts in the exchange of goods to be
coveted, this privilege always fell to the beauty represented by the female
ideal?
Only the value available to the worker, which was his debased labor, was
bought for an hour of feverish work, the only merchandise available to the
despoiled worker was sold. According to Marxist language, the proletarian was
exploited for the added value of the only input that interests the industrial
capitalist or rural capitalist: their time.
It was at this time that once again the male workforce proved to be more
productive that the social system began to explore more and pay more
for that workforce in terms of productivity, with fewer interruptions, greater
strength and more labor capacity, it was It is natural that children and women
were less in demand in the labor market.
It happened recently in Communist China where the restriction of one
child per couple naturally determined that parents wanted a boy instead of a
girl, as this represented a greater guarantee of security for their own
parents' old age.
Without this ideological gender discourse, society over the centuries
accommodated the social roles of gender according to the socioeconomic
determinations that historically and naturally in every corner determined a
double role for the female sex in the working world, neither inferior nor
superior, only roles: the man sold only his labor; the woman could compete
by making the trade off between her labor, or, something of greater value than
labor: her beauty.
For the highest value, female beauty has left its female workforce in
the background in the utilities market.
Just a matter of cost-benefit and opportunity cost, a product with an
inelastic offer with no substitute and no replacement.
The feminine beauty.
Once again, the technology of the third industrial revolution came to
rescue female labor, where the tertiary sector isolated male factors such as
strength and physical resistance as factors no longer determining
productivity in the labor market.
Telematics, computers, organization, management information systems and
financial services dominated the main economic activities, leaving to the
secondary and primary sectors of the economy, with the exception of the oil
sector, the primacy of the locomotive of modern States.
Thus, after the last two and a half century of trade off between the
offer of female beauty and the offer of female labor, the discourse became
fiercer around the issue of gender, then came the great intellectual fraud,
which is to transform a natural choice of labor market in a false ideological
issue restricted to sex , as if a gender conspiracy by simple prejudice,
called machismo, wanted to exclude women from the productive society for the
simple desire of male conspirators.
Thus, if the greatest intellectual fraud is built, which, if not stopped
in the present time, will be irremediably in a historical review in
an honest intellectual future, when the moment of initial shock of that moment
of confusion and dissimulation and victimism, the greatest of all forgeries, is
over. historical intellectuals of humanity in the twenty-first century will be
recognized as: feminism, or feminazism .
Before the third wave of revolution, male labor competed without
competitors to match it, but not now: for the first time in the history of
civilization, there is no advantage between the genders.
This empties the feminist discourse of gender ideology, since the
demonstration effect of male, western and white labor dominated in science,
arts and sports with its total hegemony, and not just of male gender: their
ethnic superiority to the inhabitants of the high cold latitudes.
With capitalism of the third wave of the industrial revolution, which
corresponds to robotic machines, programmed, computers,
system s economic s centered s in the tertiary
sector, services gained prominence in the economy resulting in increased
migration from the countryside to the cities, with emptying of fields, with the
displacement of gross labor to
a) the offices,
b) to the stores,
c) for banks,
d) for commerce,
e) for the financial sector,
f) for the health sector,
g) for the education sector,
h) for the leisure sector
i) and entertainment,
j) for the arts sector
k) and mass culture,
l) cinema,
m) theater,
n) industrial production of books,
o) music,
p) magazines,
q) newspapers,
r) fashion,
never the service sector in the history of mankind has been so hegemonic
with the mass media such as television, the internet, completely
suffocating the primary and secondary sectors, except for a few niches such as
the oil sector and the extraction of precious stones, and gold.
The third wave buried the labor-intensive industrial sector by replacing
human labor with robots, and the mechanization of agriculture mowed
down manual labor in the fields.
At this time, legal rules were created preventing women from being
soldiers, from attending schools, from studying, from becoming autonomous,
which was a strategic mistake, but it only enshrined the customs of more than
five millennia where gender roles seemed to be accommodated by human culture ,
without openly contesting women, which shows that: either the woman was
indolent, or the woman was fully satisfied with the social division of social
work.
Exceptions had it:
a) Greek women from the island of Lesbos;
b) matriarchal tribes on different continents;
c) the warrior amazons;
d) Joan of Arc;
e) European
Queens
f) Antonieta in
Portugal,
g) Queen Isabella of Spain;
h) Queen Elizabeth in Great Britain;
i) princesses,
j) Queen Victoria in England;
k) Women pharaohs like Nefertiti
l) and Cleopatra of ancient Egypt.
No statute prevented these women from doing what they did or what they
were.
It wasn't a privilege.
The male carried humanity on his back in the worst moments of the
preservation of the human species ensuring its survival and prosperity.
Thus, the woman awakened to the labor market, but found it dominated by
males, at this time the womem lib nasceus was born , a
movement for equality in the labor market only in the tertiary sector, services,
since there was never a feminist demand for occupying jobs in the heavy,
primary and secondary sectors, even today there is a noisy absence of women's
demand for these jobs not only in the primary and secondary sectors, but also
in the more arid areas of the tertiary sector. of feminist claims in
a) engineering,
b) in the arduous competitions of
c) sports such as mixed boxing (men versus
women),
d) mixed wrestling,
e) motocross,
f) motorcycle speed,
g) high performance single-seater races such
as
h) Formula one,
i) Indy Car ,
j) and both when looking for high-risk areas
k) and great physical energy.
Because?
In high latitudes in cold countries, geographical conditions were
created for the main winners awarded in Nobels in all categories to emerge, and
they do not exclude genders only, geographical exclusion of the inhabitants of
the tropics and the equator, indicating a climatic geographic
determinism .
The simplification and reductionism to the gender factor was the biggest
of all the feminists' ideological mistakes because it finds no support in
history other than anger and resentment in not being able to explain their
indolence and accommodation to the trade off factors of offers of amenities in
having to offer between two competing products:
your labor
or your feminine beauty,
most women would not have the option of beauty.
