Ape centrism or telluric centrism
Follow me through my blog at http://professorrobertorocha.blogspot.com.br
Roberto da Silva Rocha, university professor and political scientist
Humanity divided between anthropocentrism and ape centrism
Books on Amazon.com
We are trying to close an era of civilization that would begin with the end of the renaissance, now, of the renaissance that was born in Florence that ended the previous era of theocentrism, to remove man from the center of the universe as a creative and consuming agent of nature.
In this new era, now the struggle between the two groups, the old renaissance, and the new ecologist who wants to overcome the anthropocentrists, ecologists who are the defenders of the supremacy of nature over any need of human beings, much more important than the survival of itself. human species to preserve the so-called environment, proposing the suicide of the species homo sapiens.
With various names, the new era of the self-called ecologists, they take turns in the accusation of humans who only enjoy natural resources without replacing the natural resources consumed, without proper conservation, without saving such resources - despite the fact that natural resources may or not to be renewed - the new wave condemns the human lifestyle, criminalizing all anthropic actions of the human being, with the name of unsustainable consumption, even without any scientific basis supporting this theory of impossible sustainability in the face of the third law of thermodynamics which is the Entropy law of energy balance in open systems such as the universe.
Due to ignorance or ecological militancy, the belief spread that the natural resources of the earth's soil can be saved, renewed, returned to nature and reintegrated into nature through the so-called organic agriculture.
The only scientific basis for the organic resources of the fertility of arable soils is that 500 million years ago the earth layer began to form on the smooth, hot rock that was the freshly cooled earth after 4 billion years of its formation, so this stock of organic material was deposited forming the fertile soil for agriculture.
This mass of arable humus has been consumed without replacement by the plants that were born and by those plants sown by humans in the land.
Therefore the nutrients of the earth cannot be created or replaced in the earth, they can be transferred from one place to another of the earth until in a few million years the earth will again be barren for plant production by transforming the humus of the earth into another layer. trophic level that will give rise to other species that do not feed on these same organic components whose energy has transformed them into compounds and into elements of a lower energy level according to the law of entropy.
This intended infinite cycle of endless replacement of organic components does not exist in the universe, the law of entropy does not allow for an infinite cycle of energy transfer in a perpetual motion to exist.
This would be the utopia of sustainability, which violates the most elementary laws of the universe.
A star that explodes will not give rise to new stars.
We relived the cycle of Fetishism and Animism that was the Neanderthal phase, after the era of the self-criticism phase with philosophical skepticism where the enchanted nature was being dramatically reduced to the condition of mechanisms explained by scientific laws and no longer moved by the will of the deities that ruled over rains, floods, the sun, the moon, diseases, wars, day and night, fertility, death, life, Greek philosophy established metaphysics as the bridge of explanation for everything, From then on there was a dispute between scholastic philosophy and religion, and the result was the 998 years of feudalism and the Middle Ages where the center of everything was the Christian God, at the end of which even without the end of Christianity, it gave if the rupture with theocentrism and the appearance of the anthropocentrism of the Renaissance, that had its maximum point with the positivism.
We are facing a rupture or a return to the fetishist and animist world where nature is once again the center of the human world, with ecological activists who believe in things that not even science can corroborate in their theses, such as the possibility of an agriculture that neither consumes nor destroys the natural resources of the soil, or the hypothesis of human action producing the global warming of the earth's atmosphere, generating the greenhouse effect.
Other more radical approaches seek to change the diet by excluding the consumption of products and natural elements and chemical compounds such as sugar cane sugar, replacing it with sugar from beets or other vegetables such as stevia, perhaps for geopolitical reasons, the elimination of animal products, and change in consumption habits called sustainable responsible consumption. Despite the fact that many material resources are visibly depleted, such as oil, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur, uranium, certainly the pollution of lakes, rivers and seas can accelerate the destruction of life in these environments, they are real problems mixed with beliefs and hypothetical and never scientifically verifiable things, such as the anthropic action on the earth's temperature being rising even after three glaciation ages that the earth has already experienced before.
This new religious practice that excludes science and is offensive to human beings to the detriment of the humanization of nature that wants to deify everything that is natural and non-human is an act of collective anomic suicide to support an idea of the supremacy of nature over human needs. without any scientific sustainability in this current paradigmatic stage of contemporary scientific knowledge, they are just beliefs of the new church of misanthropic fanatical ecologists.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário