Philosophers
The rise of Philosophy; I admire the vain narcissistic dilettantes: Pondé, Karnal, Chauí, Cortella.
Philosophy does not submit to scientific methodology and rigorous research techniques for validation; it does not do any proof of what it says, it says whatever it wants and feels comfortable and free.
Like religion, it remains in the void of faith and draws its concepts only from consciousness and nothing else.
Everything is possible if the diction fits into the syllogistic scheme.
Tautologically, as in the abstraction of Mathematics, the difference between Mathematics and Philosophy is the perception between reality and pure imagination without the commitment to rigorously test the corollaries without appealing to stochastic principles and sophistic casts without any practical demonstration and without going through practical, theoretical and experimental validation and co-validation.
Philosophy hates empiricism, accuracy, precision, predictability, measurement, the limitation of its scope.
Philosophy attempted to abolish tradition and religion and created another religion and another tradition called everything is possible if you can imagine and translate it into words, closing the scheme of prosody that rebels against plausibility or cabalism.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário