Parametric econometrics and metrics of infidelity in adultery
It is necessary to analyze parametrically all the statistical logic surrounding adultery.
There is a very narrow margin of advantage where (excluding extreme cases of extremely toxic relationships without giving reasons for extreme financial or emotional dependence) betrayal could be justified except in terms of financial terms, the relationship depends on the continuation of pressing suffering, whether in a relationship, a relationship, a marriage or between partners.
Except for these cases, an analysis of the rationality of an extra-marital relationship or one outside of commitments of fidelity is in order. The person who is forming a couple is exactly at the maximum limit of satisfaction, suitability and reciprocal advantages that could be obtained given the contingencies in which the couple was formed, that is: everyone always has the best partner that could be obtained because of the conditions given by reality: financial, age, professional, personal such as access to a place of residence, neighborhood and country where you live, bank credit, real estate assets, everything you have or achieved was through merit, this means that everything you achieved in life is exactly what you deserved and what your money can buy, what you can achieve.
All you deserve is what you have in life: your car model and year is what you can afford; your home is in the place and of the standard that you can have; the places you frequent and your friends are of the same salary and income level; the so-called market is directed by the invisible hand of Adam Smith, who adjusted all the variables that you have and that correspond to your rigid and immutable income standard. This concerns your wife or your man, he or she is as handsome and attractive as your standard of living allows, therefore, infidelity would only occur with another partner of the same social class, which means that there can be no gain in an adulterous relationship.
Your new and future partners will always be compatible with your social class.
That said, only small differences could be observed in a possible crisis of adultery or infidelity, which should serve as consolation for those who have been betrayed, at least no material advantage is gained or lost.
As for the rest, the age, social, educational, professional, racial, residential and professional structure will be completely equivalent among people of the same social circle, therefore, the betrayed partner could also accept that he or she was not surpassed in any way by his or her partner's lover because of the betrayal, as a rule.
So what remains in betrayal where the betraying partner can claim an advantage or difference except for style or some personal skill with artistic talent, or sexual and emotional affinity?
The lover is always certain that he or she is also being betrayed because his or her partner has marital obligations. Even during the betrayal, as a consolation, the betrayed person does not feel the same pain because he or she does not know that he or she is being betrayed. Therefore, his or her love and sentimental life continues as normal.
His or her betraying partner, on the other hand, lives divided and distressed, apprehensive and frightened, incomplete and unhappy.
Therefore, the exchange of partners needs to weigh the material losses in exchange for some unknown subjective advantage in adultery that should outweigh all the traumas of a separation and the inconveniences caused to children, relatives and friends so that better sex or a slightly more romantic environment outweigh all the other parametric variables of qualities and quantities of an exchange that is merely contingent, intangible and merely personal and selfish.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário