The concept of global warming cannot exist.
Lawyers and jurists subordinated to the pressure of Ethics
And so, they went away: Zetetics, Natural Law, Positivism, Legal Positivism, Historicism, Dogmatics.
This is explained.
When an institution like the OAB (Brazilian Bar Association) embraces the thesis of the ideological theory of femicide genocide, it indicates that some ethical concern has infiltrated the ideology and the principled and supporting discourse of the main body disseminating practical directives and ethical control of universal jurisdictional activity.
In the year 2024, the violence statistics from the IPEA (Institute for Applied Economic Research) violence map, with primary data sources on violence from the IBGE (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics), which in turn collects information from police stations throughout Brazil, and from the national death registry at the Ministry of Health in the FNS (National Health Foundation) from its database of the Brazilian population mortality registration system, where deaths are recorded in all municipalities.
So, for those who have not yet reviewed these statistics and for those who are not familiar with data manipulation and statistical data analysis, the following data has been compiled from the tables: given the order of magnitude of 70,000 homicides in all municipalities, of which 35,000 are of black and brown men, and of this total 95.5% or 68,000 are men and 4.5% or 3,500 are homicides of women.
So, of all mortality, including natural causes: deaths, fatalities, homicides, poisonings, burns, clinical cases, accidents, hemorrhages of various types caused by human action, the mortality record has two important pieces of information to eliminate the mere hypothesis of hidden or concealed causes of femicide not legally registered with the police and the judiciary.
The best proxy is the age of the deceased women; the following and complementary proxy is the methodology for recording the cause of death adopted by the FNS mortality system, which consists of three layers of death information, where the authority making the registration must report three consecutive causes, including the primary, secondary, and final causes, according to the CD10 protocol, which is the international disease code of the UN WHO World Health Organization.
Having considered these two mortality parameters, it is necessary to eliminate the omitted causation, using the following heuristic: deaths of women over 50 years of age should, in principle, be considered natural; Deaths among those aged 40 and under should be checked against the mortality registry and separated when they indicate unnatural death; and deaths of women under 40 years of age should be separated as highly suspicious of premature death.
By proceeding in this way, the mortality indicated as femicide, thus separated for analysis, should be subjected to: hypothesis testing, IQ squared testing, standard deviation or variance, and finally to multivariate linear regression testing.
Having made these statistical considerations, the standard error of 2.5% suggests that the statistics of recorded female homicide are on the threshold of standard error where the imprecision indicates the degree of insignificance of mortality due to violence called femicide.
It is a very difficult index to reduce because the imprecision of the irrelevance of the data indicates a prevalence of data that are difficult to accurately ascertain due to a failure of minimum sample size, that is, mortality due to female violence is negligible in statistical terms.
Who benefits from the manipulation of statistics?
This is one of the chaotic situations where legal activity is subordinated to social clamor and the spirit of the times, which, in sociological and anthropological behaviorism, reflects the morality of its time.
Ethics is timeless, but morality translates the cultural and temporal reading of concepts derived from Ethics, just as the Egyptians, who walked naked 5,000 years ago in the first empire, did, with the first notions of morality that adapted to the slow progress of scientific development and shaped behavior and laws: with the first marriage contracts, the first land ownership contracts, the first tax systems, and the first administrative and bureaucratic processes that created royal and imperial public servants, the first laws, and the first judges, all accompanying the development of Arithmetic, Mathematics, Geometry, Grammar, Geography, Literature, and Law, all this still in a period very dependent on Religion and Superstition and its sister Alchemy.
Ethics has always progressed alongside civilization, appropriating the advances of metaphysical science, regulating it with tradition, and transcending, together with the impulse of Philosophy, the foundations of Religion. Together they created rational Ethics, competing with religion and later separating from it since the philosophical era and since the Enlightenment, the Renaissance, and...bringing an end to the Feudal cycle and the Middle Ages, gradually, with the new neo-Aristotelian neo-phenomenological anthropocentrism.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário