Roberto da Silva Rocha, university professor and political scientist
Bible is not a historical book
Books on Amazon.com
I admire Prof Sabino's intelligence as much as Prof Ferreirinha's intelligence, whom I met personally and in the only possible way that is by talking, Ferreira is really very aggressive, almost precipitating me from the top of the stairs of the Pentecostal Church in Luziânia in the middle of Sunday.
Continuing, but I am a professor of Sociology, the fact that I am an evangelical does not oblige me to tolerate certain obtuse things in the famous sacred biblical, although I do not know ancient Greek, ancient Hebrew or ancient Aramaic.
Only in the face of the technique of external validation of historical articles I have to admit that all copies of the biblical translated from the originals cannot hide the true words simply because there is a rule of philology that says that the system of interpretation of human language goes beyond the origin of words and acquire their meaning throughout the culture, so words have changed their social meaning, detaching themselves from the academic and dictionary meaning.
So, like, for example, the words: democracy, liberalism, soul, justice, all these have undergone an evolution over the course of use, some have ceased to be used, such as, for example, obnubilar, Dionysian, even products suffer in time.
Drugs, for example cocaine and hashish were not prohibited drugs, red lipstick, prostitute and prostitution in the past as well as slavery were perfectly suited to the social system.
So, therefore, I don't care about the linguistic meaning of the story of Noah's ark or the dry crossing of the red sea, they cannot be taken seriously as true facts, so the bible is contaminated by legends and lies, which for me does not fit to separate what is historical from what is not, the bible for me does not deserve serious study, whether on papyrus or in translated brochure, a lie does not choose the language.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário