dictatorship of the proletariat
The communists' tirades would be comical if they weren't tragic, unreasonable, absurd, bizarre, schizophrenic, like comparing the rich or the successful businessman to a thief; you have heard Proudhom's expression about all private property being theft.
Not some private property; or it could be one or the other; or a certain marked, identified property. Or in a place or time where private property was stolen. All property.
Thus, one easily arrives at the condition where, in a neighborhood of the capital of Pernambuco, Recife, the entire collective representative of the proletariat decides that a new high-cost real estate development for high-income people cannot be an offense to the precarious condition of the proletarian neighbors who they will have to live there in the neighborhood with so much opulence and luxury, increasing the social contrast of income inequality seen with the naked eye.
So, residents neighboring the luxury condominium who invaded those urban properties to build their precarious residences without having the lot title, without submitting to construction norms and municipal posture for housing, now demand that the state take them to the top of the hills invaded by housing that was never approved, and in the farthest corners of the jungle, in the woods, on the banks of rivers, igapés, mangroves, in the most precarious places, the State has to fulfill its duty to bring water, sewage, electricity, schools , health and police posts, hospitals and urban transport lines so that they have all the comfort of a taxpayer precisely for the non-taxpayer invaders abused proletarians.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário