segunda-feira, 12 de dezembro de 2022

Conciliatory character of Brazilian politics

Conciliatory character of Brazilian politics
Roberto da Silva Rocha, university professor and political scientist

Conciliatory character of Brazilian politics

No social organization or social movement in Brazil will ever be fundamentalist or radical in character, the condition of the common Brazilian is one of conciliation, from religions, political parties, sports, and culture, gastronomic taste, the common Brazilian mixes and syncretizes making the a more dialectical synthesis of opposites and the most antagonistic paradoxes that, even trampling logic, can build the most paralogical sophistic casts to merge extremes.

The Brazilian is from the extreme center, you will never see a gaucho, or a cearense, or a carioca, or a radical catarinense defending to the death their convictions of any ideology because Brazil started from its discovery and colonization including the indians, the African slaves, the Jews of the Inquisition, then the deserted and disillusioned Nazis, and in a way we tamed the leftist terrorist communists trained in Cuba and Yugoslavia to drink a caipirinha between training sessions of shooting an anti-armored RPG, there was always a feijoada for the sauerkraut who surrendered in Monte Castelo, where the surrendered German soldiers were treated like football players just resting between the first and second half, sharing the locker rooms and the drinking fountains after the game, so the Brazilian remains misunderstood for his ways never dissected by the Swedes and Japanese, who see no other way than to ignore all expectations of understanding why the br Asileiro considers inelegant punctuality in appointments, offering the guest the chance to reflect on the need to follow strict rules without realizing that form is not superior to essence and content, a poorly treated book is a beloved book, an impeccable book can be a unused book, the difference between: waiting, postponing, delaying, abandoning or giving up is just and only in the mind of those who interpret the fact. Just as not doing something can mean different things such as: missing the opportunity, failing to do it, forgetting to do it, inability to do it, having the luxury of being able to do nothing, losing the opportunity, postponing the opportunity, simply forgetting to do it, we will never know.


Roberto da Silva Rocha, professor universitário e cientista político

Nenhum comentário: