James Weber: Basic and Elementary

James Weber: Basic and Elementary

I will not gloat over the defeat of beliefs without scientific support, such as the Bigbang theory, not even physics students could support a theory that, like any other theory, needs to follow the methods of scientific research and the refutation of scientific methodology, the path opened by Karl Popper, who established that scientific practice is essentially an empirical empirical matrix, and the test can be a material or theoretical test, based on constructions of deductivism because they are indemonstrable principles.

The experiment carried out in the James Weber telescope was another attempt to refute the bigbang theory, as it is the essence of the refutational method, the refutational method does not seek to conform facts with theories, but seeks to undo theories and shake the foundations of scientific knowledge. to defeat it and continue to repeat the provocations against the theory and scientific paradigmatic stage until one day the entire castle of knowledge collapses on its inconsistencies and contradictions.

For the world parallel to the world of universities and for research institutes, nothing can be sacred or eternal, no scientific knowledge is immutable and permanent, everything can be questioned and discussed, tested and redone, reconstructed, because otherwise we would never have left. from horse back to the electric car, then the steam car, nor the car powered by gasoline, alcohol, hydrogen, anyway, someone contested the perfect stage of science in the timeline, it will always be like that for the scientist, but for the layman science is a unanimity that is sacred and infallible.

At some point, a theory rises to the coliseum of knowledge and is then defeated, only to be rescued, and again defeated, and replaced by another, it has already happened that a theory is contested by another theory to better explain a phenomenon, and then more emerges. another about the same phenomenon so the three theories were kept together and independent to explain the same phenomenon of light, yes the light needed three independent theories from the corpuscular theory, electromagnetic theory and quantum theory.

For those who are outside the scientific environment, they do not understand the climate of debate and healthy discussion between opponents, between competitors, always respecting the ability to argue more than the result itself, necessarily precarious and transitory, because nothing in science is permanent. , would be the death of the practice of science and its freedom to make speculations and assumptions.