segunda-feira, 5 de setembro de 2022

The flat earthers are right

The flat earthers are right



They won without dispute the trophy of imbecility.

I prefer to face Darwin's evolutionists. Evolutionists are sophisticated, they go from the correct premise to the wrong conclusion, which is a sophistry, a paralogical sophistical cast.

God does not exist, therefore, everything in the universe is the work of the laws of chance.

Nor will I discuss the first premise, because it is an irrefutable hypothesis about the existence of God.

God does not exist in the material sense, just as within the brain there is no text, photos, videos, colors, images, the only things that only exist in the brain are: blood, cortical fluids, electrical impulses, and electrochemical bioreactions, if this is information then you need to add the method of processing this information and the way of ordering the information for input and output of them in the form of words, images, information, music, flavors, smells, tastes, comparisons, measurements and intellectual, artistic, feelings, creativity , but none of this can be seen inside the brain.

Inside the RAM memory of any computer processing chip is much simpler, the information and instructions are only of two types: bit zero, and bit one.

Combinations of these two elements are converted at the appropriate location called a register into just four types of information: machine instructions; Dice; address and displacement.

With only these four types of instructions the computer can store and process: mathematical equations, texts, images, sounds, everything that the computer is programmed and also any programming language submitted to the processor in the appropriate layer.

So where is the information materially on the computer?

If you randomly open a computer and analyze any part of the circuit, you will have only two pieces of information: electric current and potential difference which can be measured in electrical resistance, induction a and electrical capacitance.

You can't see any images, texts, or sounds inside a computer.

That's God, you can't see God, as you can't see information inside the computer or inside the brain, you need a protocol to decode the signals and transform the right sequence to get the information correctly.

The abstract world that we cannot see is much bigger than the visible and sensible world, we cannot see sound, nor see air, nor see heat, nor see electricity, we cannot see the force of gravity, we cannot see pain, we can't see joy, we can't see the atom, we can't see almost everything in the universe, we see the sun eight minutes late, but any star we can still see could have turned four years ago into something else, it may not even be there anymore, time and the speed of light in the universe are measurements incapable of making any sense for the size of the universe and its scales of size and magnitude.

Therefore, the size of the universe could be measured on a scale of 10 Einstein E=mc2.

So if we assume that no living thing exists without the DNA strand, to recombine all the elements of a human DNA strand in every possible way to recombine each protein we would have 10 to the power of 78, which is to square the total number of particles existing in all known galaxies this count of elementary particles multiplied by the energies of all of them by the kinetic equation of cia of 87 which is greater than any number in the universe.

So calculating the lifetime of the universe since the supposed Bigbang we would have a value of 10 to the power of 25 seconds of time until today, so if every second the chance operating machine were randomly experimenting with every possible combination of arrangements for DNA it wouldn't it would be possible to randomly create organic life with a DNA. Hence, Darwin's work is a mathematical aberration.

It is easier to admit that the earth is supposedly flat than to imagine the hypothesis of the emergence of life on earth by accident in just 500 million years, which is just 10 to the power of 16 seconds.

Roberto da Silva Rocha, professor universitário e cientista político

Nenhum comentário: