domingo, 27 de outubro de 2024

There is no such thing as sin

There is no such thing as sin

Why do religions only talk about sin?

It is up to the judge to talk about misdemeanors, crimes and misdemeanors.

There is no crime without a prior law that establishes and defines it within a given jurisdiction.

What is sin? They are described in religious rites.

What is the jurisdiction of sin? The church, that is, the association of believers admitted as followers or members of a religion or belief.

Except for the USA, no country judges people for crimes or misdemeanors outside its territorial jurisdiction and legal competence.

To declare a sin, just as to declare a crime, misdemeanor or a felony, it is necessary to prescribe a rule that cannot be violated within a jurisdiction and to recognize the legal competence to judge and punish, by indicting the defendant and subsuming the act or fact under the rules and laws in force, constituting a trial and the imposition of penalties or acquittal, considering the mitigating and aggravating circumstances with the right to summon the defendant, the defense and the accusation duly regulated.

Therefore, sin is a transgression of approximately 800 rules of Judaism, or of the rules established by the association of the church to which the believer is subordinate and in the case of countries where religion is compulsory in the legal territory of the nation, the violation of religious statutes constitutes sin.

I have no sin.

I have never been punished by the Tennis Federation, I have never played tennis; I have not yet been punished by the FIA; I am not a Formula 1 driver; their jurisdiction does not reach me; are people outside of religions considered sinners? How can this be? They are outside the rules and do not know them because they are outside religious jurisdictions!

I am not part of any religious group to which I owe obligations to follow their statutes, therefore, outside religious jurisdiction and therefore outside theocratic countries, I am not compulsorily obliged to know their religious and spiritual laws and statutes.

Sin does not exist, therefore, those who recognize religious statutes are voluntarily subject to the consequences as long as they remain affiliated with religious associations, except for theocratic statutes that violate the right to choose. This was therefore the reason for so much confusion about the sin of Eve and Adam becoming universal, passing from the person of Eve to all her descendants, for violating the statutes of the creator in the biblical legend in Genesis, although there was no religion for Adam and Eve, there were two laws, only two, in humanity: not to eat the fruit of two trees, and Adam and Eve violated half of both statutes.

Only the Jewish people were introduced in Leviticus to atone for sins through animal sacrifice and offerings; no one outside of Judaism was compelled to do so.

As I was not part of Adam and Eve's decision, just as the aborigines of America were unaware of the prohibition or the existence of Eve, just as the insane and babies were unaware of the laws violated in the statutes, they were nevertheless punished with the death penalty by drowning in the flood, saving Noah and his small family because they knew what was coming. Perhaps they had sinned, we will never know, because the warning was for everyone to enter the ark and they were not asked to repent of their sins in order to enter the ark to be saved; they just had to believe in Noah who predicted or prophesied the flood.


Roberto da Silva Rocha, professor universitário e cientista político

Nenhum comentário: