Superwoman
Women complaining about male aloofness and disinterest in major Western cities and communities, while social media commentators are clashing and accusing each other of having anti-feminist, anti-machist, anti-feminine, and anti-masculine factions.
The argument, mainly from girls, is that men don't want to be friends, providers, gentlemen, and don't seek heterosexual relationships.
The argument, mainly from boys, is that women have become arrogant and haughty.
Both are well-founded in their claims, and both arguments are valid.
Incredibly, there are no changes in the behavior of girls and boys.
Women have always been haughty and demanding and have always complained about male attention. Always have been.
Men have always kept women at a certain distance from the male sphere, excluding women because the sexes are quite diverse and physiologically specific, and in practice this translates into a relationship of sexual interaction and complementarity.
We lived happily with the social roles of each sex, each age, each intellectual capacity, each taking care of their own interests, for which the natural social division of labor has always been established in humanity.
Then came the feminist revolution, which could be just an opportunity to offer some women the chance to experience some social roles traditionally reserved for men.
Some of these roles are quite specialized and forged in the contingencies imposed by the environment itself, and others by the universe.
Women receive a fixed quota of Graafian follicles before birth to reproduce during a phase of life from approximately eleven to forty-five years of age.
Men can reproduce daily from the age of fourteen until death.
This design of nature indicates that a man can father between zero and more than twenty thousand people, however, a woman can become pregnant every ten months during her fertile life, resulting in around zero to fifty descendants.
Nature imposed limits and differences, and feminism peremptorily ignores this. Not for gender equality, impossible in social life and given physiological contingencies.
Men's productive leisure gave them an impossible advantage to develop and recover for the female gender.
Men invented almost everything that exists in terms of utilities, technology, and science, and this was not by chance. The things that depend on the Buddha effect, which required much dedication and mental concentration, were the work of hermits confined by the polar cold, which forced them to remain isolated, sometimes for nine months of work in winter, locked up, forcing them to create a logistical system to materially secure themselves during the long winter to survive. This effort required the development of mathematics, accounting, physics, and chemistry. So, scientific knowledge was the result of the need to build a microclimate to face the rigors of the natural climate outside the shelters built to protect themselves from the elements. Therefore, men from cold climates were more productive because they were more challenged.
What did women do while men built technological civilization?
To compensate for this difference, the minds of angry feminists decided to blame men for the time lost in the intellectual development of women throughout the entire process of civilization, and finding someone to blame has never been an intelligent solution: we blame Europeans for the enslavement of Africans brought to America, we blame capitalists because they hire people extracting surplus value from their labor, and we forget that the work of the laborer and the peasant is no longer slave or compulsory labor; no one is forced to look for a job and they are there by their own free will and necessity; they could be self-employed entrepreneurs, but they chose to be employees, and then the idealistic reformist of humanity, Karl Marx, ignoring the economic and social structure, created the figure of the evil businessman.
If you observe that in post-Fidel Castro Cuban society, buildings and civil constructions are falling apart, crumbling, and rotting because the buildings and houses are the property of the communist state, which poorly cares for everyone, yet the cars on the streets of Cuba, over 60 years old, seem to have come from a time tunnel, preserved, beautiful, and showy, because the cars are private, they are privately owned.
Human beings always seek the best conditions for their survival; this is called utilitarianism. Without the interference of social reformers and idealists, especially Marxists, Christians, fascists, Nazis, and socialists, society, with the exception of feudalism, moves towards the accommodation of all kinds of needs and social exchanges.
It is always good to remember that in Germany... In the 1980s, there was a shortage of: bricklayers, carpenters, taxi drivers, garbage collectors, plumbers, and even gravediggers because of the excessive education level of the average German. Therefore, they had to import migrants from Turkey, Portugal, and other countries with lower levels of education so that German society could function again.
In Hussein's Iraq, there was a shortage of: university professors, engineers, and doctors because the social safety net provided free medicine, water, housing, and even subsidized gasoline. These specialized professionals were lacking because Iraqis weren't interested in further education. Similarly, in Germany, there was a shortage of people for the social division of labor within the social system, which is fueled by ideas for building utopian societies. There's always someone who wants to fix the world, and we know their names: Hitler, Mussolini, Karl Marx, Jesus. May God deliver us from these well-intentioned people.
Modern women are overestimated, suddenly feeling inflated without doing anything to prove their superiority in the face of the endless list of male achievements for civilization that have made the female species almost insignificant to the importance of humanity, from lists of patents registered in women's names, to awards for recorded intellectual achievements, literature, science, chess champions, list of Nobel Prizes, the female presence is insignificant to humanity, and instead of blaming men for the situation, there are now no legal and material barriers, however, nothing seems to change the female status and blaming men only proves more weakness because not even slaves remained in a condition of inferiority for so long before reacting to slavery.
All it took was a cry and the anti-feminist legal restrictions ended, it wasn't for lack of cries, they cried before, but they settle back as always.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário